Beer – Matt Simpson :// Blog

Matt Simpson on 2026-10-29 09:53 pm 🚀

Sheril Kirshenbaum on 2026-10-29 03:23 pm

“I always have been optimistic about humanity's future. Always. Even at the most dismaying of times.”

- Patrick Stewart

Matt Simpson on 2026-10-23 07:40 pm

Canadians Are Running Out Of Time To Oppose The Dangerous C-22 Surveillance Bill

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2026/10/canadians-are-running-out-time-oppose-dangerous-c-22-surveillance-bill

#cndpoli #stopmasssurveillance

Canadians Are Running Out Of Time To Oppose The Dangerous C-22 Surveillance Bill

Canada’s Parliament is debating a massive expansion of surveillance powers that will threaten the privacy and security of millions of people. Bill C-22, also called the Lawful Access Act, has already passed the House of Commons, and is now before the Canadian Senate. Canadians still have an...

Matt Simpson on 2026-10-14 04:50 am

@MozillaAI Love the direction you're going! What do you think about building an open cli + agentic coding harness that, by default, uses preferred/optimized local models or could optionally connect to Otari? I know we've got OpenCode, it's fine, but I see space for a Mozilla answer to this. #AI #Coding

Matt Simpson on 2026-10-12 05:29 pm 🚀

Ricky Mondello on 2026-10-12 08:50 am

If you actually read the “Passkeys are a trap. Do not use them.” post going around, you’ll find a transparent attempt to clumsily string together a conspiracy.

The post is predicated on the idea that a feature of WebAuthn called “attestation”, which is only used in high-assurance and usually corporate scenarios, and usually with physical hardware security keys, will be leveraged to hurt people, somehow.

The post posits that a website like X will bait and switch users: first, you get a passkey. Then, later, scary “attested” passkeys! This simply isn’t possible to do because attestation isn’t supported on the web for mass market, consumer authentication.

Attestation for passkeys (software-based, syncable credentials) is antithetical to their mass market goals, and would freeze out independent, non-corporate-backed credential managers. It’s an explicit non-goal of the designers of passkeys, who work together in a forum anyone can join.

And trust me, websites and apps like banks repeatedly asked for attestation at the beginning of the industry’s passkey journey. The platforms, browsers, and credential management apps have held firm that the goal of passkeys is reducing phishing and **not** some kind of trusted computing scheme. (And I will note: over my dead body!)

Besides the theory of the case being fundamentally wrong, there are several things that make the post disqualifying in terms of arguing something useful or important in the realm of security, privacy, and user authentication:

1. Intentionally presenting things that are complicated as inherently suspicious. (Delivering security by design can be complicated, yes!)

2. Describing TOTP as a “great solution” for adding security to a password-based account. When the most common threat model on the web is phishing (a word the post never mentions!), TOTP hardly buys you _anything_. TOTP is phishable.

3. Seeming to be unbothered by how many logical leaps are being taken without actually understanding the topic being discussed.

There are bad things happening in tech and untrustworthy people and companies do exist, but they’re largely in the AI space, not the “let’s stop people we love from getting compromised through phishing” space.